by: Bethan CowperThe payments landscape is in a state of flux and has been for the last ten years. However, we finally have the technological agility available to deal with change and meet consumer expectation. It is this synergetic meeting of ability and technology that can really drive change. What does this mean for payments? Well they are already attracting a lot of press as industry giants and disruptive start-ups alike pour investment into creating the latest innovations that solve X, Y and Z. With all these new payment types from wearables to crypto-currencies, have we lost sight of what payments mean to the member?Payments aren’t broken; they aren’t a problem that needs solving. Cash is apparently dying, yet according to MasterCard, globally 85 percent of retail banking payments are made in cash. It’s quite difficult to dispute its relevance and importance when it has the longest product lifecycle of all payment types, give or take a millennia.What about cards? Cards serve us so well; from the humble debit to the virtual prepaid, cards solve a multitude of problems and offer the consumer a choice of solutions. Dare I mention contactless? From contactless we can jump to NFC and mobile. We can pay by phone on the move, anywhere we go: the mobile device delivers undeniable convenience. But is it really the future for everyone? Please don’t get me wrong here, I really do think that contactless and mobile have a place, and that they are going mainstream. I’m not arguing that new technology isn’t useful or relevant; it’s that it isn’t a replacement.Innovation offers more freedom and more choice. For example a consumer can receive a check from their mother on their birthday; their partner might transfer them money via the Internet for bills; they can tap their card to pay in store; pay for a cab with cash; and use their mobile app to split the bill for dinner out with friends.To be successful in this option-led environment, credit unions must invest in the technology to support their activities: gone are the days of siloed product strategies and the “one channel” consumer; as are the days of technology “plasters” or wraps and short-term solutions. According to Ovum, more than two-thirds of financial institutions are looking to modernize their payments infrastructure in 2015 and this is undoubtedly motivated by the need to keep up with consumer requirements and to safeguard against any high-profile system glitches or crashes. continue reading » 11SHARESShareShareSharePrintMailGooglePinterestDiggRedditStumbleuponDeliciousBufferTumblr
Our Sports ReporterGUWAHATI: The AITA championship series Tennis will begin at the Chachal Tennis Complex here tomorrow. Around 45 players will participate in the competition. Earlier all the qualifying round matches of the boys under 12 singles event were completed today There was no qualifying round in the girls U-12 events. Also read: Local Sports
Nike’s controversial Vaporfly range will not be banned but there will be tighter regulations around high-tech running shoes, World Athletics says.Any new shoe technology developed after 30 April will have to be available on the open market for four months before an athlete can use it in competition.World Athletics has also introduced an immediate indefinite ban on any shoes that have a sole thicker than 40mm.The body will also investigate any shoes that “may not be compliant”.An immediate indefinite ban has also been introduced on any shoe that contains more than one “rigid embedded plate or blade”.For shoes with spikes, an additional plate or blade is allowed for the purpose of attaching the spikes, but the sole must be no thicker than 30mm. The ‘Alphafly’ prototype shoes worn by Eliud Kipchoge when he became the first athlete to run a marathon in under two hours in October 2019 will be banned. The shoe worn by Eliud Kipchoge when he became the first athlete to run a marathon in under two hours will be banned indefinitelyA group of experts were asked to consider whether Nike’s Vaporfly shoes give their wearers an unfair advantage.Athletes wearing the new footwear including Nike’s latest Vaporfly have taken 31 of 36 top-three finishes in major marathons last year.Kipchoge’s Kenyan compatriot Brigid Kosgei wore a Vaporfly prototype when she broke Paula Radcliffe’s long-standing women’s marathon world record in October 2019. World Athletics president Lord Coe said: “It is not our job to regulate the entire sports shoe market but it is our duty to preserve the integrity of elite competition by ensuring the shoes worn by elite athletes in competition do not offer any unfair assistance or advantage.“As we enter the Olympic year, we don’t believe we can rule out shoes that have been generally available for a considerable period of time, but we can draw a line by prohibiting the use of shoes that go further than what is currently on the market while we investigate further.“I believe these new rules strike the right balance by offering certainty to athletes and manufacturers as they prepare for the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games while addressing the concerns that have been raised about shoe technology.“If further evidence becomes available that indicates we need to tighten up these rules, we reserve the right to do that to protect our sport.”World Athletics will now establish an “expert working group” to “guide future research” into shoe technology as well as assessing any new shoes that enter the market. Why are the shoes controversial?The shoes have been criticised for “distorting the record books”, with some arguing they prevent fair competition with athletes not sponsored by Nike.Vaporflys claim to improve an athlete’s performance by 4%, and the five fastest marathons of all time have been run in the past 16 months by athletes wearing varying forms of the technology.Former British Olympic marathon runner Mara Yamauchi previously told BBC Sport that “we no longer truly have fair competition”. “It’s up to World Athletics to provide a level playing field for all… to be brutally honest, it’s hard to see how anybody not wearing Vaporflys at Tokyo is going to win medals,” she said.“Athletics has had several years of doping stories coming out in the press and the single most important thing is to restore trust and bring in more fans and sponsors.“But if we see every medal winner wearing the Vaporflys and other athletes not getting a look in, I’m not sure that people watching can really say I believe that performance 100%.”Nike said in a previous statement they “respect the spirit of the rules and we do not create any running shoes that return more energy than the runner expends”. AnalysisBBC sports editor Dan Roan Amid mounting confusion that running was becoming distorted, World Athletics has tried to provide some clarity before the Tokyo Olympics and halt what some see as an ‘arms race’ in shoe technology.Although more research will now be conducted and the rules could still develop, it seems significant the governing body admits “concerns that the integrity of the sport might be threatened”.The news will come as a relief for Nike and the athletes it sponsors.The prototype ‘AlphaFly’ that Eliud Kipchoge used to go sub-two hours last year exceeds the new restrictions and is now banned for elite runners.But as expected, the Vaporfly range that has revolutionised distance running is cleared, including the ‘Vaporfly Next%’ that Brigid Kosgei wore when smashing the women’s world record last year.That will lead to fears that the new restrictions have been conceived with that shoe’s specific dimensions in mind, are too little too late, and mean athletes sponsored by other manufacturers are at a disadvantage.The changes also put pressure on rival companies to quickly develop any new prototype shoes.They have three months to do so. After that they will need to have been widely available to buy for four months before being allowed in elite competition, ruling out their use at the Olympics.